A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours around the construction of the wall at a coastal web-site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated nationwide attention following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental concerns, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier along with the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed into a really publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, search for to construct their loved ones home. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven residents. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such spots are matter to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, specially in a very sensitive coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that's partly created, is in the proper placement. Their legal team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, in which views of The ocean are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, an image which includes given that grow to be emblematic on the intensity in the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were intended to Acquire Visible proof on the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Males entered the water in the course of extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the internet site grew to become Among the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined in detail from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as audience sought to be familiar with the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment while in the lawful timeline.
On the Main of the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as produced, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been described as meticulous in his examination of preparing files, maps, and circumstances hooked up into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting in its place that it is about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few simply endeavoring to make a relatives household in accordance Together with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Area of Conservation and say that every one will work have been performed based on professional information and permitted strategies. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the fundamental info.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how arranging disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about building of wall at coastal web page is becoming a shorthand description for just a condition that lots of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier pointed out that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-substantial drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods and René Collier waded as a result of waistline-significant water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical truth from the coastline as well as symbolic nature with the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an extreme technique.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to decide whether the wall as built complies with organizing authorization and no matter if any encroachment into Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times a Unique Location of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Reside along with each other extended following the authorized expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction operates at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the case lengthen over and above that handle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. It also underscores how swiftly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized queries. No matter if it's going to eventually be altered, taken out, or completed as planned will count on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely proceed to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.